Author(s): GómezGutiérrez,MarÃÂaJosé1;MartÃÂn-DoimeadiosTrujillo,Luis2;CervantesTorres,Laura3,MorenoTrenado,Vanessa2
Objective: to analyze the consumption of junk food in elderpeoplelivinginruralandurbanareas,aswellastover- ifyiftherearesignificantdifferencesbetweenboth.
Method: cross-sectional descriptive study in 346 elder people in a fork of age 65-95 years, living in Porzuna and Madrid. Data collection: self-administered survey with Likert scale. Data analysis: Chi-square, significance value p, confi- denceintervals.
Results: 27% of rural elder people (n=46, SD=16,26; CI95%=53,87-61,13)and39%ofurbanelderpeople(n=69) consume junk food, with significant differences: 2(1) = 6,1052; X2 crítico = 3,8415; p = 0,014 < 0,05. If we talk abouttheconsequencesinelderpeople Ìshealth,45%ofthe rural elder people (n=42, SD=14,14; I95%=48,84-55,16) and90%oftheurbanelderpeople(n=62)perceivethemas negative without statistically significant differences: X2(1) =0,067; X2crítico=3,8415; p=0,7957>0,05.
Discussion: the Business School has registered in Spain anincreaseinspendingon“junkfood”percapitaof49.65% compared to 2014. According to Garcia and illalobos, their consumptionintheelderlyisduetothedecreaseinpurchas-ingpower,wife Ìsdeathand/orthelackofsocialsupport.
Conclusions: there are statistically significant differences in the consumption of “junk food”, but not in the perception that the elderly of both groups have about their state of healthderivedfromtheirconsumption.
Clinical Nutrition and Hospital Dietetics received 2439 citations as per google scholar report